Pl m no one would me with this so plz someone i beg

here it is the attachments for the questions are here by the way so yah

part a: whether the shaded figure is a dilation of the non shaded figure. if its not a dilation, state which other type of transformation it is.

(shown in the attachment)

part b: the verticals of a figure are givin

- draw the figure and its image after a dilation with a scale factor of 4

- label the figure and its image

- identify the dilation as an enlargement or reduction

(shown in the attachment)

part c: the shaded figure i a dilation of the none shaded figure

1. star the coordinates of the shaded and non shaded figure

2. state the scale factor used

(shown in the attachment)

plz with this btw real urgent cuz no one would me and i really desperately need

PLEASE MARK BRAINLEST!

Part A:

1 - yes, dilation

2 - no, shaded is 90 degree cc of non shaded

3 - yes dilation

Part B:

For part B, just plot the points.

For the dilated figure, multiply the x and y coordinates by 4.

Ex: V(-1, -1) --> V'(-4, -4)

It is an enlargement since the scale factor is greater than one.

Part C:

unshaded: X(-4, 4) Y(-4, -4) Z(4, -4)

Shaded: X(-1, 1) Y(-1, -1) Z(1, -1)

From shaded to unshaded it is 4, since nonshaded side length are 4x longer.

From unshaded to shaded it is 1/4 because shaded side lengths are 1/4 that of unshaded.

i think it is everything has to equal 180 so, if i correct 4=c. 6=d. 8=a. 7=b. and the last question would be c. because they are parallel lines and they are congruent.

step-by-step explanation:

the reason everything has to equal to 180 is because that is how it works. i'm guessing that is its rule. 4 and 8 are congruent and parallel so, that would be 30+30 because they have the same number. it would equal 60. 6 and 7 are congruent and parallel so, that would be 30+30 because they have the same number. it would equal 60. 60+60 is 180. so, now you have your answer

whats the