The mayor of a town believes that over 39% of the residents favor annexation of a new bridge. is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to support the mayor's claim? after information is gathered from 130 voters and a hypothesis test is completed, the mayor decides to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 level.
what is the conclusion regarding the mayor's claim?
sufficient evidence or non sufficient evidence

the answer i believe is 27 units.

step-by-step explanation:

asnwer is (g o h o f)(x) = 2x - 6/x + 7

step-by-step explanation:

given,

f(x) = x - 3/x

g(x) = x + 3

h(x) = 2x + 1

we need to find : (g o h o f)(x)

we can write (g o h o f)(x) = g[ h{ f(x) } ]

so first we find h{f(x)}

h{f(x)} = f(x) + 3 = (x - 3/x) + 3

h{f(x)} = x - 3/x + 3

now we find g[ h{ f(x) } ].

g[ h{ f(x) } ] = g(x - 3/x + 3)       {plug h{f(x)} = x - 3/x + 3 in g[h{f(x)}] }

g(x - 3/x + 3) = 2 (x - 3/x + 3) + 1

                    = 2x - 6/x + 6 + 1

                    = 2x - 6/x + 7

hence we get (g o h o f)(x) = 2x - 6/x + 7