If we were conducting an experiment to test a hypothesis that people with religious backgrounds engage in more altruistic behavior than nonreligious people, what would the null hypothesis be?

a. People with less religious backgrounds engage in less altruistic behavior than people with nonreligious histories, or there is no difference between the groups with respect to altruistic behavior.

Correct, that's what we try to proof, and on this case this statement present how we need to put the null hypothesis and we have the key word "there is no difference" that is important to use when we create the null hypothesis for this type of test.

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

The null hypothesis attempts "to show that no variation exists between variables or that a single variable is no different than its mean"

The alternative hypothesis "is the hypothesis used in hypothesis testing that is contrary to the null hypothesis"

Solution to the problem

We want to proof that "people with religious backgrounds engage in more altruistic behavior than nonreligious people"

Assuming that we have the following options, we select one based on the info provided.

a. People with less religious backgrounds engage in less altruistic behavior than people with nonreligious histories, or there is no difference between the groups with respect to altruistic behavior.

Correct, that's what we try to proof, and on this case this statement present how we need to put the null hypothesis and we have the key word "there is no difference" that is important to use when we create the null hypothesis for this type of test.

b. People with religious backgrounds are more altruistic than people with nonreligious backgrounds.

That's not at all False, but the problem is that we don't specify if we have differences or not betwen the two groups, for this case is not the best answer.

c. People with nonreligious backgrounds are more altruistic than people with religious backgrounds.

That's not true since we are trying to proof the inverse statement. "people with religious backgrounds engage in more altruistic behavior than nonreligious people"

d. There would be no null hypothesis for this experiment.

False that's not correct, we have a null and alternative hypothesis for this case.

2 & 7

step-by-step explanation:

he climbs 300 ft/hr at a constant rate. the peak is at 1,500 ft.

when going up, he reaches 600 ft in 2 hours. remember, that he is going in a constant rate. divide 600 with 300:

600/300 = 2

assuming that he takes the same route back (meaning that it's a 1500 ft route back, you can solve.

note also that you are solving when he gets back to 600 ft after he reaches the peak.

first, find the amount of hours it takes to get up the peak. divide the total amount (1500), with the ft/her (300) to get the amount of hours (x):

1500/300 = x

x = 5

it takes jamie 5 hours to get up. now, he is returning down, and reaches 600 (his current destination). remember that he climbs at a constant 300 ft/hr. divide 600 with 300:

600/300 = x

x = 2

now add the two numbers together.

x = 5 + 2 = 7

jamie takes 7 hours to go up the mountain and reach his current position when descending.

(total amount/constant rate) = (time).

remember that it is a constant rate, so in total, when he gets back down the mountain, it will take the same amount of time as when he goes up. the total amount for the round trip is: 5 + 5 = 10.

~

mean, 40.6

step-by-step explanation: