Drag each expression to show whether it is equivalent to −2.6x−(−5.9x), −2.6x+(−5.9x), or neither. −2.6x−5.9x 5.9x+(−2.6x) 5.9x−(−2.6x) −5.9x+(−2.6x) −2.6x+5.9x −5.9x+2.6x −2.6x−(−5.9x) −2.6x+(−5.9x) neither

The 2 expressions are:

1) −2.6x−(−5.9x) = −2.6x + 5.9x

2) −2.6x+(−5.9x) = −2.6x - 5.9x

Options:

−2.6x−5.9x  -> equivalent to 2nd expression

5.9x+(−2.6x)  = −2.6x) + 5.9x -> equivalent to 1st expression

5.9x−(−2.6x)  = 5.9x + 2.6x = 2.6x + 5.9x ->  equivalent to neither expression

−5.9x+(−2.6x)  = −5.9x − 2.6x =  − 2.6x − 5.9x -> equivalent to 2nd expression

−2.6x+5.9x  -> equivalent to 1st expression

−5.9x+2.6x = 2.6x − 5.9x ->  equivalent to neither expression

none of the above.

for one of the equations to be used in the process, there has to be a term in the equation since squared is .

since there is only a term in the first equation, we cannot derive a from completing the square.

solving with completing the square

∠lno ≅ ∠lnm

∠oln ≅ ∠mln

step-by-step explanation:

given   that triangle lno is congruent to triangle lnm.

we have to fill up the blanks in the given question.

according to above order of congruency   kept in mind we can say that

∠lno ≅ ∠lnm

∠oln ≅ ∠mln

ln ≅ ln due to common in both.

hence, by sas congruency,

the side angle side rule   states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to another triangle, then these two triangles are congruent.