Significance tests a test of h0: p = 0.65 against ha: p < 0.65 has test statistic z = −1.78. (a) what conclusion would you draw at the 5% significance level? at the 1% level? (b) if the alternative hypothesis were ha: p ≠ 0.65, what conclusion would you draw at the 5% significance level? at the 1% level?

(a) At 5% significance level, reject H0

At 1% significance level, reject H0

(b) At 5% significance level, fail to reject H0

At 1% significance level, fail to reject H0

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) The test is a one tailed test

At 5% significance level, the critical value is 1.645

Conclusion: Reject H0 because the test statistic -1.78 is less than the critical value 1.645

At 1% significance level, the critical value is 2.326

Conclusion: Reject H0 because the test statistic -1.78 is less than the critical value 2.326

(b) The test is a two tailed test

At 5% significance level, the critical value is 1.96. The region of no rejection of H0 lies between -1.96 and 1.96

Conclusion: Fail to reject H0 because the test statistic -1.78 falls within -1.96 and 1.96

At 1% significance level, the critical value is 2.576. The region of no rejection of H0 lies between -2.576 and 2.576

Conclusion: Fail to reject H0 because the test statistic falls within -2.576 and 2.576

step-by-step explanation:

one of the most important purposes of surface treatment is to alter surface properties according to the requirement of specific applications. for example, hydrophobic coating has been utilized on windshield and eyeglasses. gold atom monolayer on substrate has become a popular surface bioconjugation strategy.  

-2/