George calculated the distance between (2, 4) and (6,3) Analyze George's work. Is he correct? If not, what was
using the distance formula. His work is shown below. his mistake?
Yes, he is correct.
1. d= (6 - 2)2 + (3 - 4)2
No, he substituted values in the wrong places
2. d = 1(4)2 + (-1)
No, he didn't use the proper order of operations
3. d = V16 +1
No, he evaluated the powers incorrectly.
4. d = V17
) Intro
Done

b. astronomers

well we know there are 4 clubs in 52 cards so it’s replaced so it should be 3/51

step-by-step explanation:

answer:   the paragraph proof is mentioned below.

step-by-step explanation:

given: in a δxwy where

such that, ∠wzx ≅ ∠yzx and zw≅zy

we have to prove that: segment zx is a perpendicular bisector of segment wy.

prove: since, zw≅zy ⇒ ∠wzy is a supplementary angle.

then, ∠wzy= 180°

⇒∠wzx + ∠yzx = 180° ( because xz divides ∠wzy into two parts)

but, ∠wzx ≅ ∠yzx ( given)

⇒∠wzy+∠wzy=180° ( by substitution)

⇒2∠wzy=180°

⇒∠wzy=90°

⇒∠wzy=∠yzx =90°

therefore, xz⊥wy where wz=zy

⇒zx is a perpendicular bisector of wy.