Anyone?

given: dg ≅ eg, gh ≅ gf.

name the postulate or theorem you can use to prove δdgf ≅ δegh.

a. sss postulate
b. sas postulate
c. asa postulate
d. aas theorem

B. SAS Postulate

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given picture, in ΔDGF and ΔEGH

DG ≅ EG, GH ≅ GF. [Given]

Also, ∠G ≅∠G    [Reflexive property]

Therefore, by SAS congruence postulate we have ,

ΔDGF ≅ ΔEGH

Hence, the postulate we can use to prove ΔDGF ≅ ΔEGH is SAS congruence postulate.

step-by-step explanation:

12: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. is a total of 7 hours.

4: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. is a total of 3 hours.

this means that from 4: 00 p.m to 7: 00 p.m. this represents 3/7 of what was lost from 12: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m.

after knowing this, after doing 11,600 - 6,800 = 4,800

4,800 represents 3/7 of what was lost for 7 hours.

we then divide 4,800 by 3 which gets 1,600.

because we know that 1,600 represents 1/7 of how much water was lost, we just have to multiply by 7, which gets 11,200.   after adding 11,200 to how much water was left at 7: 00 p.m. which was 6,800. 11,200 + 6,800 = 18,000

this means that the pool originally had 18,000 gallons in the pool.

you can also check your work by doing 18,000 - 4(1600), which becomes           1800 - 6400 which gets you 11,600.