Mathematics, 26.02.2020 02:09 Mariaisagon9050
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
What will the graph look like for a system of equations that has no solution? a. the lines will be perpendicular. b. the lines will cross at one point. c. both equations will form the same line. d. the lines will be parallel.
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
Iam at home. /: i am playing video games. translate the following statement into symbolic form.
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:50
Use a transformation to solve the equation. w/4 = 8 can you also leave a detailed explanation on how this equation = 32
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00
What is 617.3 miles and each gallon of gas the car can travel 41 miles select a reasonable estimate of the number of gallons of gas karl used.
Answers: 1
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠a...
History, 12.10.2019 21:50
Chemistry, 12.10.2019 21:50
Mathematics, 12.10.2019 21:50
English, 12.10.2019 21:50
Mathematics, 12.10.2019 21:50
Mathematics, 12.10.2019 21:50
English, 12.10.2019 21:50
Social Studies, 12.10.2019 21:50
Mathematics, 12.10.2019 21:50
Biology, 12.10.2019 21:50
Biology, 12.10.2019 21:50