If we let the domain be all animals, and S(x) = "x is a spider", I(x) = " x is an insect", D(x) = "x is a dragonfly", L(x) = "x has six legs", E(x, y ) = "x eats y", then the premises be

"All insects have six legs," (∀x (I(x)→ L(x)))
"Dragonflies are insects," (∀x (D(x)→I(x)))
"Spiders do not have six legs," (∀x (S(x)→¬L(x)))
"Spiders eat dragonflies." (∀x, y (S(x) ∧ D(y)) → E(x, y)))
The conditional statement "∀x, If x is an insect, then x has six legs" is derived from the statement "All insects have six legs" using .

a. existential generalization
b. existential instantiation
c. universal instantiation
d. universal generalization

The conditional statement "∀x, If x is an insect, then x has six legs" is derived from the statement "All insects have six legs" using "a. existential" generalization

Step-by-step explanation:

In predicate logic, existential generalization is a valid rule of inference that allows one to move from a specific statement, or one instance, to a quantified generalized statement, or existential proposition. In first-order logic, it is often used as a rule for the existential quantifier in formal proofs.

rick has $1400 and sally has $1500

step-by-step explanation:

to find amount of money rick has after 10 years :

principal = $1000 , time = 10 years , rate = 4% annually

to find amount of money sally has after 10 years :

her friend gives to pay her $50 per year, therefore money she has after 10 years = 50 × 10 = $500

also, sally gets $1000 after 10 years,

therefore, total amount of money sally has after 10 years = 500 + 1000 = $1500

so, after 10 years : rick has $1400 and sally has $1500

explanation:

infrared radiation has wavelength in the range between 700 nm and 1 mm. lets' convert these values into scientific notation, keeping in mind that:

let's start from the lower value, we have:

(we moved the dot two places to the left, so we increased the exponent by 2 units, from -9 to -7)

the higher value is:

so, the range of wavelength of infrared radiation is: