A very large study showed that aspirin reduced the rate of first heart attacks by 48%. A pharmaceutical company thinks it has a drug that will be more effective than aspirin, and plans to do a randomized clinical trial to test the new drug. a) Is the alternative to the null hypothesis more naturally one-sided or two-sided? Explain. b) The P-value from a clinical trial testing the hypothesis is 0.35. What do you conclude? c) What would you have concluded if the P-value had been 0.0035?

add the table and i will answer correctly

step-by-step explanation:

you never say the total so we cant find the percentage used for petrol

step-by-step explanation:

answer:  

step-by-step explanation:

here x represents the height of the pole,

and, the height of the shadow of the pole is 12 feet.

also, the angle of elevation from the top of the pole is 40°,

therefore,

by the low of sine,

which is the required equation for finding the value of x,

for the friend request.

when a figure, such as triangle (xyz) is reflected over the line y = x to create x'y'z' the x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the original image (pre-image) will be reversed for the image. (e.g., (x, y) > (y, x)) this means that the pre-image position of the x- and y-coordinates switch places which in turn provides a mirror like image of the original xyz.  

i notice that when i draw a line segment from x to x', that the points are parallel from each other -- they are exactly across from each other and do not intersect with any other points.  

yes, think i would see the same characteristic if you drew the line segment connecting y with the reflecting line and then y' with the reflecting line because of the essence of reflections. because it is a mirror image, each point was effected the same way which leads me to conclude that they same would apply to y and y'.