In the spring of 2016, he develops on-line videos as a supplement to his class lecture. During that semester, his average grade is 71% from a sample of 49 students. The level of significance is 2.5%. What is the correct conclusion?a. Reject the null hypothesis, conclude the grades improvedb. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, conclude the grades did not improve
c. Reject the null hypothesis, conclude the grades did not improve
d. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, conclude the grades did improve

(c) Reject the null hypothesis, conclude the grades did not improve.

Step-by-step explanation:

Null hypothesis: The grades improved.

Alternate hypothesis: The grades did not improve.

Test statistic (z) = p ÷ sqrt[p(1-p) ÷ n]

p is sample proportion = 0.71

n is sample size = 49 students

z = 0.71 ÷ sqrt[0.71(1-071) ÷ 49] = 0.71 ÷ 0.065 = 10.92

The test is a two-tailed test. At 2.5% significance level, the critical values are -1.96 and 1.96.

Conclusion:

Reject the null hypothesis because the test statistic 10.92 falls outside the region bounded by the critical values -1.96 and 1.96.

Since the null hypothesis is rejected, it therefore means the grades did not improve.

c. prove the lengths are the same.

step-by-step explanation:

you need to prove the segments are congruent. congruent segments have the same length. find the lengths of the segments using the distance formula, and compare them.

answer: c. prove the lengths are the same.

answer: a.   one is a factor of every whole number since every number is divisible by itself.