Ofie is an owner of a small fitness club. Ofie runs a promotion in which she allows each member to sign up for one free class. She uses a probability model to predict that there is a 35% chance the next member would choose cycling for their free class. Classes Tally Zumba 17 Cycling 24 Yoga 9 Kickboxing 19 Based on her experiment, which statement is true? Ofie's prediction is valid. The probability of a member choosing cycling is about 35%. There is not enough information to determine the validity of her prediction. Ofie's prediction is not valid. The probability of a member choosing cycling is the same as any other classes, so it should be about 25%. Ofie's prediction is not valid. The probability of a member choosing cycling is about 24%, according to the data collected.

34.78% so probability is 35% The first one.

Step-by-step explanation:

third choice down

step-by-step explanation:

the first inequality is based on the number of adults and campers, and the second inequality is based on the cost of feeding both the adult and the camper.

we know that there is room for 525 people max.   it's ok to have less than 525, but it's not ok to have more than 525, so the inequality is less than or equal to.   the number combination of adults (x) and campers (y) cannot exceed this 525 max.   therefore:

x + y ≤ 525

now we talk about cost.   it costs $9 to feed one adult, so depending upon the number of adults you have (x) depends upon how much it will cost to feed that number of adults.   same with the campers, who cost $5 to feed.   the adults can be represented by 9x and the campers can be represented by 5y.   since the budget cannot exceed 1,200, the second inequality is:

9x + 5y ≤ 1200

-3.5 is the distance.

i've had this question so choose the one in the absolute value sign.