Super Bowl XLVI was played between the New York Giants and the New England Patriots in Indianapolis. Due to a decade-long rivalry between the Patriots and the city's own team, the Colts, most Indianapolis residents were rooting heartily for the Giants. Suppose that 90% of Indianapolis residents wanted the Giants to beat the Patriots. What is the probability that from a sample of 200 Indianapolis residents, fewer than 170 were rooting for the Giants in Super Bowl XLIV?

Probability that from a sample of 200 Indianapolis residents, fewer than 170 were rooting for the Giants in Super Bowl XLVI is 0.02385.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that Due to a decade-long rivalry between the Patriots and the city's own team, the Colts, most Indianapolis residents were rooting heartily for the Giants. Suppose that 90% of Indianapolis residents wanted the Giants to beat the Patriots.

Let p = % of Indianapolis residents wanted the Giants to beat the Patriots = 90%

The z-score probability distribution for proportion is given by;

                   Z =  ~ N(0,1)

where,   = % of Indianapolis residents who were rooting for the Giants in Super Bowl XLVI in a sample of 200 residents = = 0.85

           n = sample of residents = 200

So, probability that from a sample of 200 Indianapolis residents, fewer than 170 were rooting for the Giants in Super Bowl XLVI is given by = P( < 0.85)

     P( < 0.85) = P( < ) = P(Z < -1.98) = 1 - P(Z 1.98)

                                                                   = 1 - 0.97615 = 0.02385

The above probability is calculated using z table by looking at value of x = 01.98 in the z table which have an area of 0.97615.

Therefore, probability that fewer than 170 were rooting for the Giants in Super Bowl XLVI is 0.02385.

answer: the answer is simply nothing.

step-by-step explanation: because there is no ending to this question

gimme brainliest > : 3

when functions are first introduced, you will probably have some simplistic "functions" and relations to deal with, usually being just sets of points. these won't be terribly useful or interesting functions and relations, but your text wants you to get the idea of what the domain and range of a function are. small sets of points are generally the simplest sorts of relations, so your book starts with those.

step-by-step explanation:

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(2, –3), (4, 6), (3, –1), (6, 6), (2, 3)}

the above list of points, being a relationship between certain x's and certain y's, is a relation. the domain is all the x-values, and the range is all the y-values. to give the domain and the range, i just list the values without duplication:

domain: {2, 3, 4, 6}

range: {–3, –1, 3, 6}

(it is customary to list these values in numerical order, but it is not required. sets are called "unordered lists", so you can list the numbers in any order you feel like. just don't duplicate: technically, repetitions are okay in sets, but most instructors would count off for this.)

while the given set does indeed represent a relation (because x's and y's are being related to each other), the set they gave me contains two points with the same x-value: (2, –3) and (2, 3). since x = 2 gives me two possible destinations (that is, two possible y-values), then this relation is not a function.

note that all i had to do to check whether the relation was a function was to look for duplicate x-values. if you find any duplicate x-values, then the different y-values mean that you do not have a function. remember: for a relation to be a function, each x-value has to go to one, and only one, y-value.

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(–3, 5), (–2, 5), (–1, 5), (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5)}

i'll just list the x-values for the domain and the y-values for the range: