Which BEST explains the expression w( xy z − 5 2 )? A) w depends on ( xy z − 5 2 ). B) ( xy z − 5 2 ) depends on w. C) w and ( xy z − 5 2 ) are dependent on each other. D) w and ( xy z − 5 2 ) are independent of each other.

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.

step-by-step explanation:

oh the deck is the size of my dic k so about 320 inches hope u get my dic k as the answer