Mark and Robyn used base- ten blocks to show that 200 is 100 times as much as 2. Whose model makes sense? Whose model is nonsense? Explain your reasoning

Robyn model makes more sense and Marks is nonsense.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this question ,calculations not required .All we have to do is consider each model logically .

Marks

Marks model shows 20 rather than 2 which means 200 is 10 times as much as 20. It does not make any sense.

Robyn

Robyn model shows 2 which means 200 is 100 times as much as 2 and this is not only correct but also makes sense because 100 *2=200

answer: no

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

12: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. is a total of 7 hours.

4: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. is a total of 3 hours.

this means that from 4: 00 p.m to 7: 00 p.m. this represents 3/7 of what was lost from 12: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m.

after knowing this, after doing 11,600 - 6,800 = 4,800

4,800 represents 3/7 of what was lost for 7 hours.

we then divide 4,800 by 3 which gets 1,600.

because we know that 1,600 represents 1/7 of how much water was lost, we just have to multiply by 7, which gets 11,200.   after adding 11,200 to how much water was left at 7: 00 p.m. which was 6,800. 11,200 + 6,800 = 18,000

this means that the pool originally had 18,000 gallons in the pool.

you can also check your work by doing 18,000 - 4(1600), which becomes           1800 - 6400 which gets you 11,600.