Here is a problem to challenge your intuition. In the original GrandPrix example, reduce the capacity of plant 2 to 300. Then the total capacity is equal to the total demand. Re-optimize the model. You should find that the optimal solution uses all capacity and exactly meets all demands with a total cost of $176,050. Now increase the capacity of plant 1 and the demand at region 2 by 1 automobile each, and optimize again. What happens to the optimal total cost? How can you explain this "more for less" paradox?

i say b hope this jdjdjdj

answer: i don't understand. what are the options

step-by-step explanation:

there are no answer choices

step-by-step explanation:

the option best identifies the textual evidence that supports this conclusion is c.) when an argument is over, how many weighty reasons does a man recollect which his heat and violence made him utterly forget? in order to recognize textual evidence is to identify the topic sentence where the author states the main idea. textual evidence is what supports the topic sentence or main idea of a passage.