Determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. Is this a valid or invalid argument?

Premise: If it has an engine, I can fix it.

Premise: Cars have engines. Conclusion: I can fix cars.

Valid Argument

Step-by-step explanation:

An argument is valid if its conclusion follows with certainty from its premises.

Given:

Premise: If it has an engine, I can fix it.

Premise: Cars have engines.

Conclusion: I can fix cars.

The argument is valid since the conclusion follows with certainty from the given premises.

intensity of the vector is v= √37 ≈ 6.08 units and make angle ∡α ≈ 9.46° with east direction

step-by-step explanation:

required vector is consists of the two componentsvx= 2+4=6 units   and vy= 1 unit and vx ⊥ vywe will use pythagorian theorem to find intensity of the vector vv∧2 = vx∧2 + vy∧2 => v = √vx∧2 + vy∧2 = √6∧2 + 1∧2 = √36+1 = √37 ≈ 6.08 unitsthe angle ∡α between vector and east direction we wil find with tanαtanα = 1/6 => α = arc tanα = arc 1/6 => α ≈ 9.46°

hope this

answerthe vertex form

step-by-step explanation: