Tanisha and Neal are simplifying the expression (StartFraction (x Superscript 4 Baseline) (y Superscript negative 5 Baseline) Over 3 (x squared) (y Superscript negative 3 Baseline) EndFraction) Superscript 4. They each began the same way.

Tanisha’s Work
Neal’s Work
(StartFraction (x Superscript 4 Baseline) (y Superscript negative 5 Baseline) Over 3 (x squared) (y Superscript negative 3 Baseline) EndFraction) Superscript 4 = (StartFraction (x squared) (y Superscript negative 2 Baseline) Over 3 EndFraction) Superscript 4
(StartFraction (x Superscript 4 Baseline) (y Superscript negative 5 Baseline) Over 3 (x squared) (y Superscript negative 3 Baseline) EndFraction) Superscript 4 = StartFraction (x Superscript 16 Baseline) (y Superscript negative 20 Baseline) Over (3 Superscript 4 Baseline (x Superscript 8 Baseline) (y Superscript negative 12 Baseline) EndFraction

Which statements are true about each person’s work? Check all that apply.

You didn't the statements from which you like to know which ones are true.

But it is discovered that Neal's work is correct to the point where he stopped, but Tanisha's work has a mistake in it.

Step-by-step explanation:

Tanisha and Neal want to simplify the expression :

(x^4 y^(-5)/3x²y^(-3))^4

Tanisha's approach

(x^4 y^(-5)/3x²y^(-3))^4

= (x²y^(-2)/3^4)^4

Neil's approach.

(x^4 y^(-5)/3x²y^(-3))^4

= x^(16) y^(-20)/3^4(x^8 y^(-12))

Simplifying the expression using Tanisha's approach.

(x^4 y^(-5)/3x²y^(-3))^4

= (x²y^(-2)/3)^4

= x^(2×4) y^(-2×4)/3^4

= x^8 y^(-8)/3^4

= 3^(-4) (x/y)^8

Solving using Neal's approach.

(x^4 y^(-5)/3x²y^(-3))^4

= (x^4 y^(-5))^4/(3x²y^(-3))^4

= x^(4×4) y^(-5×4) / (3^4 x^(2×4) y^(-3×4)

= x^16 y^(-20)/ 3^4 x^8 y^(-12)

= x^(16-8) y^(-20+12) 3^(0-4)

= x^8 y^(-8) 3^(-4)

= x^8/3^4 y^8

= 3^(-4) (x/y)^8

From this, we can say that straightaway Neal's is on the line. His approach is correct, so is his work.

Tanisha's approach is acceptable too, but the results in her work is questionable. There should be

(x²y^(-2)/3)^4 not (x²y^(-2)/3^4)^4, it changes everything.

It will be 2,3,4 and 6.

Step-by-step explanation:

took the test and they came out that these where the correct. Plus when looking at the work you can tell that they both are on tract and are correct. and the next steps needed to be taken.

step-by-step explanation:

i found the life tables for the year 2012. 

life table of males at age 30. probability of dying between ages x and x+1

total population:  

29–30 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001030

30–31 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001061

males:  

29–30 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001420

30–31 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001448

white population

29–30 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001005

30–31 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001037

white males

29–30 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001372

30–31 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001399

non hispanic white population

29–30 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001083

30–31 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001116

non hispanic white males

29–30 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001477

30–31 . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.001503

jacob, non hispanic white male. 30 years old.

probability that jacob lives to be 30 years old. 

since the given probabilities are probabilities of dying, i think we simply subtract it from 1 to get the probability of living. we will use the probability of non hispanic white male.

                                          probability of living to be 30 y.o.

29 - 30 : 1 - 0.001477 = 0.998523

30 - 31 : 1 - 0.001503 = 0.998497

then say something, tell them they won’t respect you if you don’t even have respect for your self sweetheart you need to lay it on them, all of it : )