An equation states two things are equal to the other one side is equal to the other side. a)4y+8 b)4y+8=16

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Remmi wrote the equation of the line y=⅓(x+2) he solved for x and got x=3y-2 which of the following is an equivalent equation for x? a.x=y-11/3 b.x=y+7/3 c.x=3(y-⅔) d.x=3(y+⅔)

Cass decided to sell game programs for the hockey game. the printing cost was over 20 cents per program with a selling price of 50 cents each. cass sold all but 50 of the programs, and made a profit of $65. how many programs were printed? letting p represent the number of programs printed, set up an equation that describes this situation. then solve your equation for p.