subject
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 20:30 tori6886

Maude evaluated the expression (32)–3. 1. 32 • (−3) 2. 36 3. 729 Analyze Maude’s work. Is she correct? If not, what was her mistake? Yes, she is correct. No, she should have added the exponents instead of multiplying. No, her exponent should be a negative value No, when evaluating 36, she should have found the product of 3 and 6.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:20
How do you convert 1.27 to a percentage
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
Which table represents a linear function? i'll give brainliest to first answer ^'^
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:40
The human resources manager at a company records the length, in hours, of one shift at work, x. he creates the probability distribution below. what is the probability that a worker chosen at random works at least 8 hours? probability distribution px(x) 6 hours 7 hours 8 hours 9 hours 10 hours 0.62 0.78 пол
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Consider circle c with angle acb measuring 3/4 radians.if minor arc ab measures 9 inches, what is the length of the radius of circle c? if necessary, round your answer to the nearest inch.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Maude evaluated the expression (32)–3. 1. 32 • (−3) 2. 36 3. 729 Analyze Maude’s work. Is she correc...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 07.12.2020 19:20
question
Spanish, 07.12.2020 19:20
question
English, 07.12.2020 19:20
question
Mathematics, 07.12.2020 19:20
Questions on the website: 13722367