^ Casey was able to map line segment UV onto line segment ST using a translation and a rotation.

Casey concluded:

"I was able to map line segment UV onto line segment ST using a sequence of rigid transformations without a dilation, so the figures are congruent but they are not similar."

What error did casey make in her conclusion?

A. The correct conclusion is that the segments are congruent and similar.
B. The correct conclusion is that the segments are neither congruent, nor similar.
C. There is no error. This is a correct conclusion

Which one is it please?

we have the parent function given by,

1. the function is translated 5 units to the left.

so, we get,   becomes

2. the function is translated 5 units to the right.

so, we get,   becomes

3. the function is translated 5 units upwards.

so, we get,   becomes

4. the function is translated 5 units downwards.

so, we get,   becomes

5. the function is reflected across x-axis.

so, we get,   becomes

6. the function is reflected across y-axis.

so, we get,   becomes .

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest.

i have not got your picture clearly so see it once again

if you get paid hourly because if you get a salary you could work all week and only get paid a certain amount no matter how much you work but if you get paid hourly then you get paid for every minute you worked.