A survey was conducted two years ago asking college students their top motivation for using a credit card. To determine whether the distribution has changed, you randomly select 425 college students and ask each one what the top motivation is for using a credit card. Can you conclude that there has been a change in the claimed or expected distribution? Use
α
= 0.5.

Response Old Survey % New Survey Frequency, f
Rewards 29% 112
Low Rates 23% 97
Cash Back 22% 108
Discounts 7% 47
Other 19% 61
(a) What is the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis, and which one is claimed?

(b) Determine the critical value and rejection region.

(c) Calculate the test statistic.

(d) Reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. Interpret the decision in the context of the original claim.

, and

for

step-by-step explanation:

we can analyze the pattern at which the terms increase. let us denote , , , so that we can call

note the following:

the pattern: to get the next term value, we just add the next term number (e.g. 1st, 2nd, to the previous term value (term values are the given numbers in the question, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15,

from , to get to , we add

from , to get to , we add

etc.

we need to form a recursive formula, a formula that has the next term as a function of the previous term. so a possible recursive formula can be

, and for

answer: 4 meters

step-by-step explanation: to you understand 2/3 better you can do 1 divided by 3 = . then multiply that by the 2 which is .66666666666666667 then you would do 6 x .66666666666666667 which is 4.      

hope this .

answer: you need to organize this better it does not make sense.

step-by-step explanation: ?

answer: the answer is one

step-by-step explanation:

pemdas, in this situation there is no parenthesis or exponents so you go to multiplication, 1x1=1, then division 1/1= 1 then addition 1+1=2 then subtraction 2-1=1