Determine whether the results appear to have statistical significance, and also determine whether the results appear to have practical significance. In a study of a gender selection method used to increase the likelihood of a baby being born a girl, 1936 users of the method gave birth to 950 boys and 986 girls. There is about a 21% chance of getting that many girls if the method had no effect.

Due to the fact that there is 21% chance of getting that many girls by chance and also In conjunction to that; there is no test involved as well , we can conclude that the method does not have statistical significance.

The result does not appear to have a practical significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

In  a random selection 1936 users, we observed that the method gave birth to  950 boys and 986 girls

There is about a 21% chance of getting that many girls if the method had no effect.

Due to the fact that there is 21% chance of getting that many girls by chance and also In conjunction to that; there is no test involved as well , we can conclude that the method does not have statistical significance.

Given that:

The number of girls = 986

Number of boys = 950

Number of babies born = 1936

The percentage of girls = number of girls born/ number of babies born

The percentage of girls = 986 /1936

The percentage of girls = 0.5093

The percentage of girls =  50.93%

We can infer that this method does not have a practical significance  because most couples would not prefer to use a method that raise the likelihood of a girl from the approximately 50% rate expected by chance to the 50.93% .

x² + 3x + 7 = 0       [ax² + bx + c]

a = 1

b = 3

c = 7

quadratic formula:

    (+/- is this ±)

plug in the numbers into the variables

your answer is a

answer: 8 years

step-by-step explanation:

the explanation is that in 8 years the child will be 20 and in 8 years the father will be 40 and 20 is half of 40.