A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored lowering environmental standards so that high-sulfur coal could be burned in coal-fired power plants. The results were: At the .02 level of significance, can we conclude that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards? Determine the p-value.

We conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

Step-by-step explanation:

The complete question is: A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored lowering environmental standards so that high-sulfur coal could be burned in coal-fired power plants. The results were:

Number sampled: 1,000 (republican) , 800 (democrats)

Number in favor: 200 (republican) , 168 (democrats)

At the 0.02 level of significance, can we conclude that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards? Determine the p-value.

Let = proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

= proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards.

SO, Null Hypothesis, :     {means that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards}

Alternate Hypothesis, :     {means that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z-test for proportions;

                         T.S. =    ~ N(0,1)

where, = sample proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards = = 0.20

= sample proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards = = 0.21

= sample of Republicans = 1000

= sample of Democrats = 800

So, the test statistics  =  

                                     =  -0.52

The value of z test statistics is -0.52.

Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by the following formula;

            P-value = P(Z < -0.52) = 1 - P(Z 0.52)

                          = 1 - 0.6985 = 0.3015

Now, at 0.02 significance level, the z table gives a critical value of -2.054 for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of z as -0.52 > -2.054, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

hope this .

r3t40

tell you what. i'll find the length of the medians and you can fill in the blanks where they belong.

br

b = (2a,0)

r = (a/2,b/2) remember these things are medians. they go to the 1/2 way point of the line opposite the vertex they face.

br^2 =   (2a - a/2)^2 + (0 - b/2)^2

br^2 = (3/2 a) ^2 + b^2 / 4

br^2 = 9/4 a^2 + b^2 / 4   we need to find some relationship between a and b.

let's try ab = bc  

ab = 2a

bc = (2a - a)^2 + (b - 0)^2

bc = sqrt(a^2 + b^2)

ab = bc

2a = sqrt(a^2 + b^2) square both sides.

4a^2 = a^2 + b^2 subtract a^2 from both sides.

sqrt(3a^2) = sqrt(b^2)

sqrt(3)a = b

let's put b into br^2

br^2 = 9/4 a^2 + 3b^2 / 4

br^2 = 12 a^2 / 4

br^2 = 3a^2 

br = sqrt(3) * a

cp

c = (a,b) ; p = (a,0) this is another application of the distance formula, and it is a good one.

cp^2 = (a - a)^2 + (b - 0)^2

cp^2 = 0 + b^2

cp^2 = b^2 which you can see from the diagram. 

cp = sqrt(b^2)

cp = b but b = sqrt(3) * a 

cp = sqrt(3)*a

aq

a = (0,0)

q = (3/2) a, b/2

aq^2 = (3a/2 -0)^2 + (b/2 - 0)^2

aq^2 = 9a^2/4 + b^2/4

but b = sqrt(3) * a 

aq^2 = 9a^2 / 4 + (sqrt(3)*a)^2 /4

aq^2 = 9 a^2/ 4 + 3 a^2 / 4

aq^2 = 12 a^2/4

aq^2 = 3 a^2

aq = (sqrt  3) * a which agrees with the other two.