Sample Response: His work is not correct. You first must switch x and y and then solve for y. Compare your response to the sample response above. What did your explanation include?
the conclusion that the work was incorrect
an explanation that Talib did not switch the variables at the start
an explanation that Talib did not solve for the variable y

step-by-step explanation:

there is a formula i can give you:

it is r^2*n*sin(360/n) divided by 2 where r represents the "radius" and n is the number of sides.

plug them in:

(10sqrt(3))^2*6*sin(360/6) divided by 2

100*3*6*sin(60) divided by 2

900*sin(60)

900*sqrt(3)/2

450*sqrt(3)

approx is 779.4 cm^2

stethere all not eveanp-by-step explanation:

i only know the sequence of arithmetic it adds the first is 5+4 then it goes up as it adds to then it is 9+5 then 14+6 then to 20+7 and so on. 5,9,14,20,27,35.

step-by-step explanation: