gary, Heather, and Irene want to find the zeros of the polynomial P(x). They evaluate the polynomial for different values and find: P(−1)=0 P(0)=1 P(2+3–√)=0 Each student interprets this information separately and presents his or her conclusions to the group. Gary concludes that since P(−1) and P(2+3–√) equal 0, 2 zeros of P(x) are −1 and 2+3–√. By the Irrational Root Theorem, 2−3–√ is also a zero of P(x). Heather concludes that since P(0)=1, 1 zero of P(x) is 1. There isn't enough information to determine any other zeros of P(x). Irene concludes that since P(−1) and P(2+3–√) equal 0, 2 zeros of P(x) are −1 and 2+3–√. There isn't enough information to determine any other zeros of P(x). Which statements correctly explain why each student is correct or incorrect?

ñplokuhtgfedij

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

sorry i just needed points for a quiz plz for give me

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.