What is the reason for the fourth and eight steps in the proof?

  so the transitive property can be invoked in step 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Without the figure, it is difficult to tell what these steps do. However, the symmetry of the proof suggests that step 4 can match step 8, and its Reason can be "deduced from steps 2 and 3."

The idea of steps 4 and 8, taken together, is to show that DC and DB are both equal to DA, so the transitive property can be invoked in step 9.

i think the correct option is the second option.

b) k’(6, 4); l’(3, 3)

step-by-step explanation:

a 270° clockwise rotation maps every point (x, y) to (y, -x). (it negates the x-coordinate and then switches it and the y-coordinate.)

this means the endpoints of the side congruent to kl, k' and l', would be mapped as:

k'(-4, 6)→(6, 4)

l'(-3, 3)→(3, 3)