Would (3, 7.2) be a realistic solution for the function? Explain. Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet(s). No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners. Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s). No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).p

No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet(s).

No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners.

Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).

No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).

According to nypost, they spend an average of $2000+ a year on their pets. So 3 owners either spending $720 on their pets each or combined is unrealistic. If this is wrong, it's because I have no idea what the function is.

a complex number is a number that can be expressed in the form a + bi, where a and b are real numbers, and i is a solution of the equation x2 = −1. because no real number satisfies this equation, i is called an imaginary number. has no real solution, since the square of a real number cannot be negative.

13.33%

say 50 oranges, then 100 apples

80 are red, 20 are yellow

total fruit = 150

20chances out of 150 for yellow

20/150 = 13.33%