Can you help me solve this question? (Also explain me how is it possible)

Answer B) (2 times )

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's start with the person that shook hands more (Dora), so we already know how four of this connections took place See attached image.

step 1:

D is connected to A, B, C, and E

Step 2:

Now proceed with the connections for the second greatest (C who shook hands with 3 people). Notice that C is already connected with D, and can connect with B and with E, but NOT with A (since this person shook hands only once - with D. So C is connected to B, D, and E completing the three handshakes.

step 3: Now just corroborate that B is already connected to two people (C and D).  So just count the number of connections that E is left with: 2 handshakes.

∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

step-by-step explanation:

given, a ∥ b and ∠1 ≅ ∠3 .we have to prove that e ∥ f

we know that ∠1≅∠3 and that a || b because they are given. we see that by the alternate exterior angles theorem. therefore, ∠2≅∠3 by the transitive property. so, we can conclude that e || f by the converse alternate exterior angles theorem.

we have to fill the missing statement.

transitivity property states that if a = b and b = c, then a = c.

now, given ∠1≅∠3 and by transitivity property ∠2≅∠3 .

hence, to apply transitivity property one angle must be common which is not in result after applying this property which is ∠1.

the only options in which ∠1 is present are ∠1 and ∠2, ∠1 and ∠4

∠1 and ∠4 is not possible ∵ after applying transitivity we didn't get ∠4.

hence, the missing statement is ∠1≅∠2.

so, ∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

answer: 819.89 miles across america

step-by-step explanation: