A study claimed residents in a suburb town spend at most 1.9 hours per weekday commuting to and from their jobs. A researcher believed commute times were now different and wants to test this claim by sampling 14 adults. Sample statistics for these 14 adults are: X = 2.2 $=0.7 Can the researcher support the claim that mean commuting time is more than 1.9 hours ? Test using a =.01.

There is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that mean commuting time is more than 1.9 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  population mean is  

   The  sample mean is  

    The standard deviation is  

     The  sample size is  

      The level of significance is  

The null hypothesis is  

The  alternative hypothesis is

 Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

The  p-value is obtained from the z-table,  the value is  

Looking at the value of    we see that  

So we fail reject the null hypothesis

    Hence we can conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that mean commuting time is more than 1.9 hours

answer: get more recipes with 3 magazines for $20! i often use chicken broth instead of water. 3 tablespoons butter, divided; 1/2 cup freshly grated parmigiano-reggiano bring water and salt to a boil in a large saucepan; pour polenta slowly into 5 minutes to thicken; stir and taste for salt before transferring to a serving bowl.

the figures below are made out of circles, semicircles, quarter … find the area and the perimeter of each figure and give your answers as a completely simplified exact value in terms of π (no approximations). remember that we'll also have to cut whatever areas we get in half, since we're only dealing

step-by-step explanation: