The figure below shows a parallelogram ABCD Side AB parallel to side DC and side AD is parallel to side BC A student wrote the following sentences to prove that parallelogram ABCD has two pairs of opposite sides equal For triangles and COB alternate interior angle ABD is congruent to angle CDB because AB and DC are parallel lines Similarly interior angle equal to angle CBD because AD and are parallel lines equal to DB by the reflexive property Therefore , triangles ABD and COB are congruent by the SAS postulate Therefore AB congruent to and AD congruent BC CPCTC Which statement best describes a flaw in the student's proof ?

Second choice

Explanation :

The postulate that is used in order to prove the congruency of the triangles is the ASA which means (Angle – Side – Angle). The property that is applicable for the congruency of DB to itself is the reflexive property. Therefore, the answer to this item is the second choice.

Hope I helped! :)

If yes mark me BRAINLIEST!

Tysm!

the answer to this question is yes

step-by-step explanation:

the original amount doesn't ''re just looking for the time it takes for 1/2 of the substance to we have

(1/2) =)     take the ln   of both sides

ln (1/2)   = )   and we can write

ln(1/2) = ) lne     and lne   = 1     so we have

ln(1/2) = -.1092t     divide both sides by -.1092

t = ln(1/2)/-.1092 = about 6.347 days = about 6.3 days (rounded)