Jeremy says that 5.676677666777... is a rational number because it is a decimal that goes in forever with a pattern. Is he correct. Why or why not?

, and

for

step-by-step explanation:

we can analyze the pattern at which the terms increase. let us denote , , , so that we can call

note the following:

the pattern: to get the next term value, we just add the next term number (e.g. 1st, 2nd, to the previous term value (term values are the given numbers in the question, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15,

from , to get to , we add

from , to get to , we add

etc.

we need to form a recursive formula, a formula that has the next term as a function of the previous term. so a possible recursive formula can be

, and for

b. ol

step-by-step explanation:

i got the answer right on edg.

congruent: (geometry) (of figures) identical in form; coinciding exactly when superimposed.

i would be 2,000 just get the square root of 50 which is 2500 and the divid 4/5 and last thing multiply the answer you get for that by the square root of 50

step-by-step explanation: