A professor teaches an undergraduate course in statistics. He uses a lot of sports examples to explain key concepts. He is concerned that this may have biased his instruction to favor male students. To test this, he measures exam grades among women (n = 10) and men (n = 10). The mean score in the male group was 82 ± 4.0 (M ± SD); in the female group, it was 74 ± 8.0 (M ± SD) points. If the null hypothesis is that there is no difference in exam scores, then test the null hypothesis at a .05 level of significance for a two-tailed test. Use denominator of 2.98.

The null hypothesis is  rejected

Therefore there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the professors teaching method favored the male

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The sample size for each population is  

   The  first sample  mean is  

    The  second sample  mean is  

    The  first standard deviation is  

    The second standard deviation is  

     The  level of significance is  

The  null hypothesis is  

The  alternative  hypothesis is  

Generally the standard error is mathematically represented as

=>        

=>        

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=>        

=>        t =  2.83

Generally the p-value  mathematically represented as

From the z table  

So

Since  

Hence the null hypothesis is  rejected

Therefore there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the professors teaching method favored the male

or

step-by-step explanation:

we need to solve for 'x' the following equation:  

we have that:

⇒

⇒ ⇒

factorizing, we get that:

  ⇒

then, the solutions are: or

nothing extraneous has been found!

i get you, what you should do is think of the positive things that would come out of it. it will make yours parents proud and raise your grade. you should always try and if you can't focus tell the teacher.