What is the justification for the step taken from line 2 to line 3?
3x +9-7X=X+10+X
-4x+9 = 2x+10
-6x+9= 10
-6x=1
x = 6 음
(A) the subtraction property of equality
(B) the multiplication property of equality
(C) combining like terms on one side of the equation
(D) the distributive property
Submit

c

step-by-step explanation:

i think because what else can be a sample of every member

60.9774

step-by-step explanation:

because when you add 47.6 plus 7.32 equals 54.92

and when you add .0574 + 6= 6.0574

and when you add 54.92 and 6.0574 you get the answer of 60.9774.

plzz mark brainlest last one got deleted. cause i didn't explain it but i did but i understand what the mod meant

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.

substitute,

circle 1 = 5

circle 2 = 20

circle 3 = 44

in this case no matter how you add, you will always get a perfect square..

hence proved

happy to

pls mark as brainliest