Use a truth table to test the validity of the following argument. If you are a hound dog, then you howl at the moon. You don’t howl at the moon. Therefore you aren’t a hound dog. Valid or invalid

i dont know and i dont care for math bc it is a stupied subject

step-by-step explanation:

answer: it's a

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

it will be a cylinder. with a diameter of 8 and 4 single pieces high

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)