subject
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 05:01 Nakerria

Which of the following could not qualify as a logical argument? Explain your reasoning. Question Help Choose the correct answer below. A. A series of statements in which the conclusion comes pefore the premises. When the conclusion comes before the premises, the argument is actually a fallacy. B. A series of statements that generate heated debate. If the statements lead to a heated debate, then the statements are not a logical argument C. A series of statements in which the conclusion comes before the premises. In a logical argument, the premises need to come before the conclusion D. A list of premises that do not lead to a conclusion A logical argument cannot have more than one premise E. A series of statements that generate heated debate. If the statements lead to a heated debate, then the people who are debating are not thinking logically. F. A list of premises that do not lead to a conclusion. A logical argument needs to have a conclusion ?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00
Match the vocabulary to the proper definition. in probability, two events in which 1. conditional probability the outcome of one event is independent of the outcome of a second event. 2. dependent events in probability, two events in which the outcome of one event is dependent on the outcome of a second event. the probability of an event in which the outcome of the event is conditional on the outcome of one or more different events. 3. independent events
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30
Sam opened a money-market account that pays 3% simple interest. he started the account with $7,000 and made no further deposits. when he closed the account, he had earned $420 in interest. how long did he keep his account open?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00
Which is a logical conclusion based on the given information? a. figure abcd is a rhombus by the definition of a rhombus. b. segment ac is congruent to segment dc by cpctc. c. angle acb is congruent to angle adc by the angle-side-angle theorem. d. triangle acd is congruent to triangle cab by the hypotenuse-leg theorem.
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:20
Prove the converse of the pythagorean theorem using similar triangles. the converse of the pythagorean theorem states that when the sum of the squares of the lengths of the legs of the triangle equals the squares length of the hypotenuse, the triangle is a right triangle. be sure to create and name the appropriate geometric figures.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which of the following could not qualify as a logical argument? Explain your reasoning. Question Hel...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.12.2019 23:31
question
Mathematics, 27.12.2019 23:31
question
Mathematics, 27.12.2019 23:31
Questions on the website: 13722360