In a survey of 267 professional athletes, it was found that 137 of them owned a convertible, 111 of them owned a giant screen TV, and 134 owned a sporting goods store. 35 owned a convertible and a store, 55 owned a TV and a store, and 57 owned a covertible and a TV. 15 owned all three items. How many athletes did not own any of the three items? How many owned a covertible and a TV, but not a store? How many athletes owned a convertible or a TV? How many athletes owned exactly one type of item in the survey? How many athletes owned at least one type of item in the survey? How many owned a TV or a store, but not a convertible?

step-by-step explanation:

i think asking google will you get the answer to that question

the correct answer is b. negative exponential growth.

step-by-step explanation:

you can tell it's an exponential function because it decreases rapidly then levels out and never touches the x-axis.

it is negative because the y-axis decreases as the x-axis increases.

therefore it is a negative exponential growth graph.

hope i !

on monday rodney ate 1/4th of the sandwich = 3/12

on tuesday he ate 1/3rd of the sandwich = 4/12

therefore in total he has eaten = 3/12 + 4/12 = 7/12

thus we can say that he has eaten 7/12 of the sandwich on monday and tuesday alltogether.

happy to

pls mark as brainliest.