Se the figure to answer the question that follows: Segments UV and WZ are parallel with line ST intersecting both at points Q and R respectively

When written in the correct order, the two-column proof below describes the statements and reasons for proving that corresponding angles are congruent:

Statements Reasons

segment UV is parallel to segment WZ Given

Points S, Q, R, and T all lie on the same line. Given

m∠SQT = 180° Definition of a Straight Angle

m∠SQV + m∠VQT = m∠SQT Angle Addition Postulate

m∠SQV + m∠VQT = 180° Substitution Property of Equality
I m∠SQV + m∠VQT − m∠VQT = m∠VQT + m∠ZRS − m∠VQT
m∠SQV = m∠ZRS Subtraction Property of Equality
II m∠SQV + m∠VQT = m∠VQT + m∠ZRS Substitution Property of Equality
III m∠VQT + m∠ZRS = 180° Same-Side Interior Angles Theorem

∠SQV ≅ ∠ZRS Definition of Congruency
Which is the most logical order of statements and reasons I, II, and III to complete the proof? (5 points)

II, I, III

II, III, I

III, I, II

III, II, I

The correct logical order of statements and reasons I, II, and III to complete the proof is:

Option: c.  II, III , I

Step-by-step explanation:

Definition of a straight line--

The definition of a straight line states that the angles that lie in a straight line is 180°.

Hence, from the following figure we have:

∠SQT=180°

Angle Addition Postulate--

It states that if the point lie in between the ray, then the sum of two angles formed with the help of the ray is equal to the larger angle.

i.e.

∠SQV+∠VQT=∠SQT

Substitution Property of Equality--

It states that if:

a=b and a=c then b=c

Hence we have:

∠SQV+∠VQT=180°

Hopefully this helped if not HMU and I will get u a better answer

-have a great day! :)

when functions are first introduced, you will probably have some simplistic "functions" and relations to deal with, usually being just sets of points. these won't be terribly useful or interesting functions and relations, but your text wants you to get the idea of what the domain and range of a function are. small sets of points are generally the simplest sorts of relations, so your book starts with those.

step-by-step explanation:

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(2, –3), (4, 6), (3, –1), (6, 6), (2, 3)}

the above list of points, being a relationship between certain x's and certain y's, is a relation. the domain is all the x-values, and the range is all the y-values. to give the domain and the range, i just list the values without duplication:

domain: {2, 3, 4, 6}

range: {–3, –1, 3, 6}

(it is customary to list these values in numerical order, but it is not required. sets are called "unordered lists", so you can list the numbers in any order you feel like. just don't duplicate: technically, repetitions are okay in sets, but most instructors would count off for this.)

while the given set does indeed represent a relation (because x's and y's are being related to each other), the set they gave me contains two points with the same x-value: (2, –3) and (2, 3). since x = 2 gives me two possible destinations (that is, two possible y-values), then this relation is not a function.

note that all i had to do to check whether the relation was a function was to look for duplicate x-values. if you find any duplicate x-values, then the different y-values mean that you do not have a function. remember: for a relation to be a function, each x-value has to go to one, and only one, y-value.

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(–3, 5), (–2, 5), (–1, 5), (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5)}

i'll just list the x-values for the domain and the y-values for the range: