Is 3.32... irrational or rational

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Given that abcd is a rhombus, what is the value of x?

In the diagram, the ratios of two pairs of corresponding sides are equal to prove that almn - axyz by the sas similarity theorem, it also needs to be shown that x 6 z un z zz un = 2x zləzz lezy