What conclusion can you draw from the following statements using the Law of Syllogism? • If a figure is a square, then it has four sides.
• If a figure has four sides, then it is not a triangle

The potions for the answer is in the photo

Using the Law of Syllogism, the conclusion that you can draw from the two given premises is: C. If a figure is a square, then it is not a triangle.

The law of Syllogism is a method of deductive reasoning which involves drawing a conclusion from two premises.

Applying this law, there are usually three statements.

Statement 1: If a, then b (premise)

Statement 2: If b then c (premise)

Statement 3: If a, the c (conclusion)

In the question above, in the same vein, from the first and second statement, we can conclude that:

If a figure is a square, then it is not a triangle, because a square has 4 sides and a triangle doesn't.

Therefore, using the Law of Syllogism, the conclusion that you can draw from the two given premises is: C. If a figure is a square, then it is not a triangle.

Learn more about the Law of Syllogism here:

link

answer: the two figures are congruent.

step-by-step explanation: they're congruent because figure efgh is reflected across the x and y axis but it was also rotated.

hope it !

a c

step-by-step explanation: