Tonya and Pearl each completed a separate proof to show that alternate interior angles AKL and FLK are congruent. Who completed the proof incorrectly? Explain. Tonya's Proof

Statement Justification

1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given

2. ∠AKL ≅ ∠GKB 2. Vertical Angles Theorem

3. ∠GKB ≅ ∠FLK 3. Corresponding Angles Theorem

4. ∠AKL ≅ ∠FLK 4. Transitive Property

Pearl's Proof

Statement Justification

1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given

2. ∠AKL ≅ ∠GKB 2. Definition of Adjacent Angles

3. ∠GKB ≅ ∠FLK 3. Corresponding Angles Theorem

4. ∠AKL ≅ ∠FLK 4. Transitive Property

im pretty much rich with points here so 100 points i think each person gets 50 but im not sure anyways yea brainliest will be given if the answer has an explanation