While performing a vertical line test on a graph, you notice that the graph intercepts the vertical line twice. Which of the following correctly interprets the result of the test? (1 point) Because the vertical line intercepted the graph exactly twice, the graph is of a function. Because the vertical line intercepted the graph more than once, the graph is of a function, but it is not a relation. Because the vertical line intercepted the graph more than once, the graph is of a relation, but it is not a function. O Because the vertical line did intercepted the graph exactly twice, the graph is a function and a relation

The correct statement is:

Because the vertical line intercepted the graph more than once, the graph is of a relation, but it is not a function. ⇒ C

Step-by-step explanation:

We use the vertical line test on a graph to show the graph represents a function or a relation

If the graph and the vertical line intersected at an only ONE point then the graph represents a functionIf the graph and the vertical line intersected at more than one point, then the graph does not represent a function it represents a relation

Let us use these facts to answer the question

∵ While performing a vertical line test on a graph, you notice that

   the graph intercepts the vertical line twice

→ That means the line intersected the graph at more than 1 point

∴ The graph does not represent a function it represents a relation

The correct statement is:

Because the vertical line intercepted the graph more than once, the graph is of a relation, but it is not a function.

You would have to multiply all of the numbers

This is what i found “an explicit formula designates the nth term of the sequence, as an expression of n (where n = the term's location). it defines the sequence as a formula in terms of n. this example is an arithmetic sequence(the same number, 5, is added to each term to get to the next term).” i hope this you for what your looking for. can you plz mark me brainliest?