Each morning darnell does a combination of aerobics and stretching exercises. the exercises burn different amounts of calories per minute. the following system represents the time darnell exercises and the amount of calories burned. in the system, x represents the number of minutes darnell spends doing aerobics and y represents the number of minutes he spends stretching x+y=60
15x+5y=500

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Tracy solved the following problem. which of the statements is true? 9 ÷ 3 + 6 × 2 3 + 6 × 2 9 × 2 18 her answer is correct. her answer is incorrect. she should have multiplied before dividing. her answer is incorrect. she should have multiplied before adding. her answer is incorrect. she should have added before dividing.

Find the value of x. give reasons to justify your solutions! l, m ∈ kn