Kris claims that the two figures must be congruent. Two triangles have angles 100 degrees, 50 degrees, and 30 degrees.

Which statement best describes his claim?
He is correct because both figures are triangles.
He is correct because the measures of the angles are the same in both figures.
He is incorrect because the triangles are not oriented the same way.
He is incorrect because the lengths of the corresponding sides of the figures are unknown.

correct answers below:

5 quiero

6 vamos

7 puedan

8 quiero

9pedemos

10 dorme

step-by-step explanation:

the answer for the question that you are asking is 4

a) 40 more; b) old factory:   10%, new factory:   16%; c) week 4

explanation:

a) at week 0, we see in the graph that the new factory produces 190 specialty items.  

using the function, substituting 0 in for w,

this is a difference of 230-190 = 40.

b) the function for the old factory is written in the form f(x) = a(1+r)ˣ, where a is the original amount, x is the amount of time and r is the growth rate.   the equation for the old factory is ; 230 is in place of a and is the original amount; w is the amount of time; which means 1+r = 1.1.   this means that r must be 0.1 or 10%.

for the new factory, we find the percent of increase to find the growth rate; the formula for this is

between the first two points, the amount of change is 220-190 = 30; this gives us

30/190 = 0.158 ≈ 0.16 = 16%

c) at week 0, the old factory has 230 while the new factory has 190.

at week 1, the old factory has 230(1.1) = 253 while the new factory has 220.

at week 2, the old factory has 230(1.1²) = 278.3 while the new factory has 252.

at week 3, the old factory has 230(1.1³) = 306.13 while the new factory has 290.

at week 4, the old factory has 230(1.1⁴) = 336.743 while the new factory has 337.   this is the first week that the new factory surpasses the old.