Elena gives the following sequence of transformations to show that the two figures are similar by transforming ABCD Into EFGD.
1.
Dilate using center D and scale factor 2.
2.
Reflect using the line AE.
Is Elena's method correct? If not, explain how you could fix it.

Is Elena's method correct?

Need so much on this one how many yards?

The probability that a tutor will see 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 students is given below determine the probability distribution's missing value.

Which is a logical conclusion based on the given information? a. figure abcd is a rhombus by the definition of a rhombus. b. segment ac is congruent to segment dc by cpctc. c. angle acb is congruent to angle adc by the angle-side-angle theorem. d. triangle acd is congruent to triangle cab by the hypotenuse-leg theorem.