Question Help Error Analysis Richie says that 2.141441444... is a rational number. Elsa disagrees and says the
number is irrational. Decide who is correct and what might likely cause one of them to make the error.
Who is correct? What might likely cause one of them to make the error?
A. Richie is correct. Elsa may see 2.141441444... as not showing a repeating pattern.
B. Both Elsa and Richie are correct. Numbers like 2.141441444... are both rational and irrational.
C. Elsa is correct. Richie may see 2.141441444... as showing a repeating pattern.
D. Both Elsa and Richie are incorrect. The number cannot be classified as rational or irrational.

answer:

the position of equilibrium will shift to the left.

step-by-step explanation:

the general equation for the dissociation of a weak base is

b + h₂o   ⇌   bh⁺ + oh⁻

according to le châtelier's principle, when a stress is applied to a system at equilibrium, the system will respond in a way that tends to relieve the stress.

if you apply a stress by adding more bh⁺ or oh⁻,   the system will respond by moving in a direction that gets rid of the added ions.

the position of equilibrium will shift to the left, forming more of the undissociated base.

it shoild be o

step-by-step explanation:

i agree because i see the other persons thinking is clear

step-by-step explanation:

two pairs of adjacent sides are of equal length. this implies that one diagonal divides the kite into congruent triangles, and so the angles between the two pairs of equal sides are equal in measure. it also implies that the diagonals are perpendicular.