Kim's age is twice that of her sister. when you add kim's age to her sister's age you get 36. how old is each sister?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What additional information could be used to prove that δxyz ≅ δfeg using asa or aas? check all that apply. ∠z ≅ ∠g and xz ≅ fg ∠z ≅ ∠g and ∠y ≅ ∠e xz ≅ fg and zy ≅ ge xy ≅ ef and zy ≅ fg ∠z ≅ ∠g and xy ≅ fe

Which expression is equivalent to 16 in exponential form? a) 4 × 4 b) 8 × 2 c) 23 d) 24