In triangles ABC and LMN, ∠A ≅ ∠L, ∠B ≅ ∠M, and ∠C ≅ ∠N. Is this information sufficient to prove triangles ABC and LMN congruent through ASA? Explain your answer.

You could use AA instead

Step-by-step explanation:

You have given that three angles are equal to three angles in another triangle. You haven't mentioned any sides, so I don't think you can use ASA. However, when you use AA, you just need to prove that two angles from one triangle are congruent to two others in another triangle because the last angle would have to be equal.

what do you mean by fog

step-by-step explanation:

answer: c, the green line

step-by-step explanation:

there is no black line, eliminate b.

simple interest implies periodic payments, but the red line shows no payments, eliminate d.

simple interest has equal payments. if paid say every day, the graph is about a straight line (actually a stairstep).

the yellow line is not straight, eliminate a.

check: the green line is straight, answer is c.

simple interest with positive interest rate gives a straight line sloping up to the right. green line:

g(t) = $100 + ($200-$100) ÷ (20 years) × (t years)

= $100 + (4%/year) × ($100)(t years)

incidentally, the yellow line curving upward represents continuously compounded interest

y = $100 × 2^(t years / (14 assuming the yellow line hits $200 at 14 years. 2^0 is 1, so y(0) = $100; 2^(14/14) is 2, so y(14) = $200.