A mudslide left 42 acre-feet of mud in a valley. The mud is being removed at the rate of 5 acre-feet per day.

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Si la base de un triángulo isósceles mide 70 m y el ángulo opuesto a ésta mide 58°; entonces ¿cuánto mide la altura de dicho triángulo? a) 21.87 m. b) 40.01 m. c) 43.74 m. d) 63.14 m.

Can some one explain this i got sent this. is this a threat i’m scared