sara affirme que la somme de trois entiers consécutifs est toujours impaire. a t-elle raison . mickeal affirme que la somme des trois enters consécutifs est toujours un multiple a trois a t-il raison?

a

step-by-step explanation:

answer: the angel abc is 30°,and the abc is a triangle where the angel bac is 90°

so ac is the half of 24=12ft,and from the pythagorean theorem we find ba

ba=√bc^2-ac^2=√576-144=√432=12√3ft

so bac is 12+12√3=12(1+√3)ft

step-by-step explanation:

f(gx)=f(1/x+2)

=(1/x+2)+2

=(1+2x)/2+2

=(1+2x+4)/2

= (2x+5)/2

the answer on ed. is:

c. "the graph of f(x) has exactly two x-intercepts."

hope i could someone! : )